Posted Jan 16, 2005
An Interview with c. c. dust
Author of Mr.
Blur
By Tim Davis
I recently read and reviewed an unusual and
entertaining new novel, Mr. Blur, by the eponymous author, c.
c. dust. My review appears
here in
NewPages.
But I have a confession to make about my
encounter with Mr. Blur. When I finished reading the book, I
really had to put it aside for a day or so, and I used that time to
think a bit more about c. c. dust’s detective story. I knew I had to
pick it up again, read it again, and take another look at the
author’s frequently puzzling contortions of style, characterization,
plot, setting, and theme. Don’t misunderstand. I was not “put off”
by the author’s curious brainteasers but was instead mystified and
fascinated. I knew that I hadn’t read a conventional
detective/mystery novel (the form I admit to most enjoying when it
appears in the more orthodox, conservative Golden Age forms). But
somehow the author’s Austerian/Borgesian adoption and morphing of
the basic genre actually worked.
After my second reading, and after writing the
NewPages review, I contacted the publisher and tracked down
the somewhat secretive Pynchonesque author who agreed to an email
interview.
Tim Davis: Thanks for taking time to answer some
questions about Mr. Blur. I have tried to make my questions
short, to the point, somewhat randomly organized, and flexible
enough to allow you plenty of room for whatever answers you wish (or
do not wish) to provide. Here they are. What kind of novel would you
call Mr. Blur? Is there a style, form, or genre label you
would ascribe to the novel? Why the cyberspace/gaming/virtual
reality motif and themes? I see you going out of the way to blur the
lines (excuse the pun) between printed texts, e-texts, graphic art,
“literature,” genre fiction, conventional space, and cyberspace. Is
that part of your “game” strategy in the novel?
c.c. dust: Thanks for your interest in Mr. Blur.
I’ll try to answer your questions in order. I guess I would call
the novel schizo-fiction. Since bookstores don’t seem to have a
schizo book section, I guess I would put it on a shelf called
science fiction or, more to my taste, general fiction, subcategory
post-modern, addled fiction. You ask about the
cyberspace/gaming/virtual reality motif. Just stand in the middle of
Times Square, NYC, and you’ll get a pretty good feel for the pace of
the modern media world. We’re hit with overt/covert messages all the
time. And sometimes it seems hard to tell the difference between
reality and advertising. The “game” (if you want to call it that)
might be in deciphering all these strange and conflicting signals.
TD: Whom do you see as the audience for your
novel? Who are your readers?
ccd: I assume younger people will like the book
more than older people. Older people may not “feel” modern media in
quite the same way. Anybody who’s interested in recurring archetypes
and genre fiction would probably enjoy the book.
TD: Perhaps some readers will not embrace (or
even understand) your thematic vision. In fact, many might be
completed baffled. Are you concerned about that? What you say to
them?
ccd: Baffled? I don’t know why. It all seems
pretty clear to me. Confusion is part of the picture. But, yeah, I
do try to communicate.
TD: Why the interesting morphing and benign
mangling of the P.I. novel form? Is there something about detective
novels that you find particularly well-suited to your purposes in
this novel? What detective novels (as your influences or
antecedents) most interest you?
ccd: I love hard-boiled detective stories. The
detective is a great metaphor, a great hero, and a great lead role.
I think the search for truth is timeless. And the classic templates
are Marlowe and Spade. I tried to take that mythic model and inject
it, so to speak, into the future, where it might take root and grow
in another form.
TD: Which of your characters do you most
esteem? Why?
ccd: I love all the characters. I spent a long
time getting to know them. But I guess I feel most attached to Maya
Nation and then to Ian Citrine, since they, to some degree,
represent the creative force (which motivates the book).
TD: Tell me a bit more about Dr. Mayhem
and his appearance in the novel. Comic book? Game? Both? Other? Can
you talk more about your involvement with or interesting Dr. Mayhem?
ccd: Dr. Mayhem is the original pulp/fodder
from whence the child grew; by that I mean comic books and video
signals, like nursery rhymes, shaped my world. That’s the mythic
seed, so to speak.
TD: By whom do you think you are most
influenced as a writer/artist?
ccd: I’ve been influenced by so much stuff it’s
impossible to sort it all out: Durer, Dali, Escher, Goya, Bosch,
Blade Runner, Matrix, Existenz, Pynchon, DeLillo,
Stephenson, Delaney, Paris Hilton, Courtney Love, Ru Paul, Raymond
Chandler, Andy Warhol, Frank Frazetta, Dashiell Hammett, Pulp
Fiction, Sherlock Holmes, Fu Manchu . . . the list goes on and
on.
TD: What are your previous writing/artistic
enterprises? What do you plan for future writing/artistic projects?
ccd: This is my first book. I’m currently
fiddling with another book called Sadoch set in San
Francisco, and I’m thinking about a sequel to Mr. Blur called
The Renegade Master, and I’m thinking about having a bag of
chips.
TD: Tell me a bit more about yourself, c. c.
dust. Am I correct about understanding the name as a drug-allusion
pen-name? Why that pen-name? Why the meta-fictional device of
inserting the author (yourself?) into the novel? (Is it coincidence,
in fact, that the author appears on page 221 which might be
perceived as a near-perfect allusion to the Baker Street address of
another important detective character? What do you think?
ccd: c. c. dust is less about a drug reference
and more about a carbon copy. I put the author in the book because I
love mirrors and complications and circles that never end. The near
perfect allusion is, of course, one of those near perfect
coincidences that make things more interesting.
TD: If you were forced in one word to explain
the cube (which figures prominently in the novel), what is the word?
ccd: The cube in one word is: central.
TD: If you were forced to explain Mr. Blur
(character and novel) in one word, what is the word?
ccd: Mr. Blur in one word is: enigmatic.
TD: Any other comments you wish to offer
preemptively in response to questions I have asked or neglected
asking?
ccd: Thanks again, Tim. I hope this helps. —
cc.
[Check out the review of Mr. Blur in
NewPages
here.]
Interview conducted
December 4, 2004